|
The following information may
serve to answer some basic questions about our limited
English proficient students in Catawba County Schools.
Please feel free to contact your ESL teacher, Barbara
Piekarski, or Susan Witherspoon for any questions you may
have.
Grading Guidelines
Grades 3-6: Teachers may provide LEP students who score Novice-Low,
Novice-High, and Intermediate-Low on the IPT English
Language Proficiency Test with an “S” for Satisfactory or
“N” for Needs Improvement.
Grades 7-8: Teachers will grade LEP students with the traditional grades
given at those grade levels.
Grades 9-12: Classroom Teachers and ESL Teachers will grade LEP students
with the traditional grades given at those grade levels. Top
Exemption Eligibility
LEP Students who are in their first year
to U.S. Schools and who score below Intermediate-High on the
Reading IPT Language Proficiency Test are exempted from
State Reading and Writing Assessments, including the NCCLAS.
Students are required to take the State
Math Assessments or NCCLAS for Math.
Top
NCCLAS Eligibility
State
guidelines allow students to be eligible for the NCCLAS if
the following two criteria are met:
-
In U.S.
Schools less than 2 years or 24 months from the initial
date of enrollment, and
-
Students
must score below Intermediate-High on the Reading
portion of the IPT Language Proficiency Test to be
eligible for the Reading and Math NCCLAS. For the
Writing NCCLAS, students must score below Superior on
the Writing portion of the IPT Language Proficiency
Test.
FAQs Concerning NCCLAS
Top
Accommodations
The state is very clear that LEP
students only have those accommodations on state tests that
they have been using on a regular basis in their classrooms.
What if the accommodations change
during the course of a school year?
Changes in the use of
accommodations are documented on our LEP Educational Plan.
When changes occur, this should be a team decision by the
ESL teacher and the classroom teacher. The testing
coordinator should be immediately notified of any changes in
accommodations.
The following accommodations may
be used for LEP students on state tests:
-
Testing in a separate room
-
Schedule extended time (Must
be completed within the same day the test is
administered)
-
Multiple testing sessions
(May take 2-3 days)
-
Test Administrator reads test
aloud in English (Recommended only for students who
score below the Advanced proficiency level on the IPT.
In addition, if this accommodation is used, then the
entire test must be read aloud.)
-
Student reads test aloud to
self
-
English/Native Language
Dictionary or English/Native Language Electronic
Translator Top
IQ Testing (Grades 3 and 6)
Students may not receive any
accommodations on IQ tests. Because the IQ test at grades 3
and 6 is a beginning test for possible eligibility into the
Academically Gifted program, any LEP student who may score
low because of language or who may have been excluded from
the IQ test may enter the AG Pool for further consideration
through any of the following criteria:
-
Teacher recommendation,
parent recommendation, student recommendation (self);
-
EOG scores;
-
Scores from nationally normed
achievement tests;
-
Student performance;
-
Other criteria.
Top
LDPs (Grades
3-8)
LDPs are local tests and are
given to indicate student progress. Students who may be
taking the NCCLAS may be included in LDP administration if
ESL and content teachers believe this inclusion will be
beneficial for the student. Top
Waivers
Limited English proficient
students in grades 3 through 8 who are no longer eligible
for the NCCLAS and whose English language is below Superior
in reading and writing in accordance with the Guidelines
for Testing Students with Limited English Proficiency
may receive a waiver from the student accountability
standards for a maximum of two years after the end of the
NCCLAS eligibility. The waiver must be requested in
writing. Students/parents desiring a waiver must submit
a request to the Appeals Committee. (See Catawba County
Schools Student Accountability Policy.)
Top
Retention
-
When students are not
performing at grade level, the decision to send notices
of possible retention to parents is a decision made by
the principal at each school.
-
The decision to retain a
child should be made as a team, which includes
but is not limited to the classroom teacher, ESL
teacher, principal, parent, etc.
-
Federal law is very clear
that no LEP child should be retained where language is
the reason for the retention. Top
Exceptional Children’s Program
Students with disabilities who
are served through the EC program must have an Individualized
Education Plan written by the IEP team. The ESL teacher
must be a member of this team for students with disabilities
who are also LEP. All issues of testing, including
decisions regarding modifications/accommodations, are made
through this IEP team process, not through the ESL teacher. Top
PPEPs (Grades K-2) and PEPs
(Grades 3-12)
The following information is in
addition to Catawba County Schools PPEP and PEP guidelines:
-
All LEP students should have
PEPs written for them.
-
PEPs for LEP students should
include:
-
Dated samples of student's
work over time that reflect the content of the
Standard Course of Study for that grade level. (See
a Guide to the Standard Course of Study for LEP
Students for suggestions of content exercises
for limited English proficient students.) It is
extremely important that these work samples indicate
what the LEP student is or is not able to do.
Writing samples are extremely valuable and offer
much insight into a student’s language acquisition.
-
K-2 Students-Literacy
Assessments, Math Assessments, IRI(s), etc.
-
Grades 3-12-Relevant Work
Samples¾Checklist on front of PEP folder offers
guidelines.
-
English Language
Proficiency test scores;
-
Classroom and ESL
teachers are encouraged to write a brief paragraph
or narrative about the student and the student’s
performance in class.
-
The ESL teacher should be a
vital component of the PPEP and PEP development
process. The ESL teacher can be an “intervention” if
checked on the PPEP/PEP form by the classroom teacher.
The ESL teacher can share language assessment
information as well as language work samples from ESL
class that can be included in the folder. In addition,
the ESL teacher can help in getting translators and
assist in arranging the required parent conference if
language is a factor. The ESL teacher also may attend
and assist the classroom teacher at the required
parent-teacher conference. Top
Student Assistance Team
LEP students with PEPs should not
routinely be recommended for referral to Student Assistance
Teams. Only LEP students who are making no progress after
the PEPs have had time to work should be referred. The ESL
teacher must be present at the SAT meeting for the LEP
student. The lack of language proficiency is not a reason
for referral to the SAT. Top
Refusal of ESL Services
Students who have refused ESL
services are still entitled to modifications on state tests,
and if they meet the 2 criteria, they may be eligible for
the NCCLAS. Top
Levels of English Proficiency
|
English
Proficiency
Level |
Novice Low |
Novice High |
Intermediate Low |
|
Listening |
No functional ability
in understanding spoken English. |
Understands simple
questions and statements on familiar topics if
spoken very slowly and distinctly; often requires
restatement in graphic terms.
|
Understands most
questions, statements, and conversations on familiar
topics spoken distinctly at normal speed; requires
occasional restatement. |
|
Speaking |
No functional ability
in speaking English. |
Able to satisfy routine
daily speaking needs. Can ask and answer questions
on very familiar topics. Speaking vocabulary is
inadequate to express anything but the most
elementary needs. Should be able to follow simple
classroom directions.
|
Can handle with
confidence but not facility most daily speaking
situations. Can handle limited scholastic language
requirements; will need help for most tasks. Limited
vocabulary often reduces the students to verbal
groping or momentary silence. |
|
Reading |
No functional ability
in reading English.
|
Reads and understands
simple narrative and descriptive text. Vocabulary
for comprehension is limited to simple elementary
needs such as names, addresses, dates, short
informative signs (ex. street signs, no smoking,
exit). Material understood rarely exceeds a single
phrase and comprehension requires rereading and
checking. Can recognize all letters in the alphabet.
Detail is overlooked or misunderstood. |
Sufficient
comprehension to understand simple material. Can
read messages, greetings, popular advertising,
letters, and invitation. Can guess at unfamiliar
vocabulary if highly contextualized. Understands
short discourse on familiar topics.
Misinterpretation still occurs with more complex
material. May have to read material several times. |
|
Writing
|
No functional ability
in writing English. |
Able to copy isolated
words or short phrases. Can write simple, memorized
material with frequent misspellings and
inaccuracies. |
Sufficient control of
writing system to meet some survival needs. Able to
compose short paragraphs or take simple notes on
very familiar topics grounded in personal
experience. Evidence of good control of basic
sentence construction and inflections such as
subject/verb agreement and straightforward
syntactic constructions in present, past, and future
time though errors occasionally occur. |
|
English Proficiency
Level |
Intermediate High |
Advanced
|
Superior |
|
Listening |
Understands most
informal questions, statements, and conversation at
normal speed; comprehends lectures on familiar
subjects with some difficulty. |
Understands most
conversation and most lectures on familiar subjects
at normal speed. |
Understands academic
topical conversation and most lectures with no
difficulty. |
|
Speaking |
Participates
effectively, sometimes hesitatingly, in social and
academic conversations; makes occasional errors in
idiom and structure, often obscuring meaning. |
Able to speak the
language in most situations. Comprehension is quite
complete for a normal rate of speech. Makes
occasional errors in idiom and structure obscuring
meaning. |
Able to use the
language fluently on all levels, normal to
school-related needs. Can understand and participate
in almost any conversation with the range of
experience with a high degree of fluency. |
|
Reading |
Able to read simple
printed material within a familiar context. Can read
uncomplicated prose on familiar subjects in
frequently used sentence patterns. Some
misunderstandings. Able to read the facts but cannot
draw inferences.
|
Sufficient
comprehension to understand most factual information
in non-technical prose as well as some discussions
on current topics related to special interests. Able
to read for information and description, to follow a
sequence of events, and to react to that
information. Able to separate main ideas from lesser
ones and to use that division to advance
understanding. Can locate and interpret main ideas
and details in material written for the general
public. |
Able to read at a
normal rate of speed standard newspaper items
addressed to the general reader, routine
correspondence reports, and technical material in a
field of interest. Can gain new knowledge from
material on unfamiliar topics in areas of a general
nature. Can interpret hypotheses, supported
opinions, and conjectures. Able to “read between the
lines.” May be unable to appreciate nuance or style. |
|
Writing
|
Sufficient control of
writing system to meet most survival needs. Can take
notes in some detail on familiar topics and respond
to personal questions using elementary vocabulary
and common structures. Can express fairly accurately
present and future time. Can produce some past verb
forms but not always accurately or with correct
usage. |
Can write simple social
correspondence, take notes, write summaries, and
describe with factual topics. Still makes common
errors in spelling and punctuation, but shows some
control of the most common conventions. Able to join
sentences in limited discourse but has difficulty
in producing complex sentences. Paragraphs are
reasonably unified and coherent. |
Able to use the written
language effectively in most exchanges. Can write
short papers and express statements of position,
points of view, and arguments. Good control of
structure, spelling, and vocabulary. Can use complex
and compound sentence structures to express ideas
clearly and coherently. Still has problems tailoring
writing to a variety of audiences and styles. |
|